Correlação entre compacidade, energia incorporada e emissões de CO2, em projetos de habitação de interesse social

Abstract

Civil construction consumes a large amount of raw materials and energy. In energy consumption specifically, the residential segment is very significant because it uses, in all energy sources, the equivalent of the commercial and public sectors together, ranging from the energy to materials and components production, such as the energy used in the use phase of buildings. In Brazil, the social housing sector had a significant growth with the program “Minha Casa Minha Vida (MCMV)” (my house, my life), which aims to reduce the Brazilian housing deficit and to promote economic growth. Actions aimed at saving and optimization of construction are very timely, from the design stage to execution, given the current energy crisis the country is facing, and the scale of social housing segment. In this context, the design plays a crucial role as an inducer of the rationalization of construction, therefore, the choice of materials and decisions on the architecture has a direct influence on materials consumption and related impacts. The study aims to investigate the relationship between design compactness (through economic index of compactness) and construction systems used in social housing developments (EHIS) with embodied energy and CO2 emissions. The research examined five designs of buildings of MCMV, considering construction systems (structural masonry with ceramic bricks, masonry with concrete blocks and concrete walls) for each design. The study was conducted through three steps: (1) quantification of the materials of the designs; (2) analysis of the embodied energy and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, from data published in the literature and in the CES Selector software; (3) verification of the relationship between compactness and construction systems, with consumption of EI and CO2 emissions. Regarding the consumption of materials, the results show an approximate 20% difference in weight (kg) between projects with lower and higher economic index of compactness, and the difference between 16% to 20% in EI analysis and CO2 emissions, considering the same construction system.